Wikipedia gets a lot of things wrong.
Consider this alms aside, Wikipedia is fueled by competitive pedantry and emo-ness. How great is that?
Wikipedia was a big help for science, especially science communication, and it shows no sign of diminishing in importance.
The accuracy of Wikipedia can be dodgy in some places, but in maths, it's really quite good.
Wikipedia has a way of compiling compendiums of information on subjects.
We talked about the Internet and Wikipedia and how facts and history are being collectively created online.
Wikipedia is a victory of process over substance.
I have heard that my Wikipedia entry is completely incorrect, but then again, so is everyone else's. I haven't bothered about that.
Wikipedia is so dangerous.
There's actually a thing called Wikifeet that's the Wikipedia of celebrity girls' feet.
The core of Wikipedia is something people really believe in. That is too valuable for the world to screw it up.
I go on Wikipedia and alter pages of animals with fake facts that I've made up about those animals.
Wikipedia flourished partly because it was a shrine to altruism.
Wikipedia is kind of extreme, where a very, very small group of people contribute pretty much everything.
I think it's going to make her wikipedia page. It's her biggest accomplishment this year.
Wikipedia is kind of weird. I feel it's lame to put up my own page, but I desperately want someone else to do it.
